RUDIGRAMS (G) http://alph.laemeur.com/txt/RUDIGRAMS-G ©2016 Adam C. Moore (LÆMEUR) <adam@laemeur.com> As I am creating this file in November without having first collected the prior rudigrams of the year, what appears herein will have no particular sequence. ---[2016-11-20T03:47:52.969Z]--- GBJ.1138 CAPITALIZE I REMEMBER THINKING IT SHOCKING AND SOMEWHAT OUTRAGEOUS TO MY THEN HIGHLY CONVENTIONAL SENSIBILITIES THAT MY BEST FRIEND DELIBERATELY CHOSE NOT TO USE ANY CAPITALIZATION IN HIS TYPEWRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE - THIS WAS ROUGHLY TWENTY YEARS AGO - I AM LESS JARRED BY IT NOW AS I HAVE SEEN RATHER A LOT OF PEOPLE ADOPT THE SAME CONVENTION OVER THE YEARS - THE THOUGHT I CONTINUE TO HAVE IS THIS - IF YOU ARE GOING TO SHIRK CAPITALIZATION AND RENDER YOUR WORDS ENTIRELY IN THE FORMS OF ONE TYPE CASE THEN WHY ON EARTH WOULD YOU CHOOSE THE LOWER CASE - MINISCULE GLYPHS ARE GARBAGE - WHY WOULD YOU NOT REVERT TO THE SOLID MAJISCULE FORMS OF OUR EARLY LATIN ALPHABET - THE FORMS CARVED IN STONE UPON CAPITOLINE MONUMENTS AND THEIR STARK MODERN SANS SERIF DESCENDANTS - WHY WOULD YOU CHOOSE THE CRUMPLED DISTORTIONS SHAPED BY THE SHORTCOMINGS OF SCRIBES - CAN IT REALLY BE THAT YOUR INDOLENCE OR APATHY IS SO GREAT THAT IT IS NOT ONLY TOO MUCH BOTHER TO PERIODICALLY ACTUATE THE SHIFT KEY WHILST TYPING BUT INDEED THE VERY RARE SETTING OF THE CAPS LOCK KEY IS ITSELF TOO BURDENSOME FOR YOUR FLACCID WILL